Lawsuit accuses UnitedHealth of using AI to reject medical treatment for elderly patients

Families of former beneficiaries claim UnitedHealth's AI system "aggressively" rejected claims for medically necessary expenses.

Lawsuit accuses UnitedHealth of using AI to reject medical treatment for elderly patients
entertainment
21 Nov 2023, 12:33 AM
twitter icon sharing
facebook icon sharing
instagram icon sharing
youtube icon sharing
telegram icon sharing
icon sharing
Healthcare Lawsuit Alleges UnitedHealth Used Faulty AI Algorithm

Healthcare Lawsuit Alleges UnitedHealth Used Faulty AI Algorithm

The families of two now-deceased former beneficiaries of UnitedHealth have filed a lawsuit against the health care giant, alleging it knowingly used a faulty artificial intelligence algorithm to deny elderly patients coverage for extended care deemed necessary by their doctors.

The lawsuit, filed last Tuesday in federal court in Minnesota, claims UnitedHealth illegally denied "elderly patients care owed to them under Medicare Advantage Plans" by deploying an AI model known by the company to have a 90% error rate, overriding determinations made by the patients' physicians that the expenses were medically necessary.

Medicare Advantage plans, which are administered by private health insurers such as UnitedHealth, are Medicare-approved insurance plans available to elderly people as an alternative to traditional federal health insurance plans, according to the U.S. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services.

The use of the allegedly defective AI model, developed by NaviHealth and called "nH Predict," enabled the insurance company to "prematurely and in bad faith discontinue payment" to its elderly beneficiaries, causing them medical or financial hardships, the lawsuit states.

AI Model Used to Deny Health Coverage

AI Model Used to Deny Health Coverage

A recent complaint alleges that UnitedHealth's AI model is being used to deny health coverage to the elderly, forcing them out of care facilities or depleting their family savings to continue receiving necessary medical care. The complaint claims that the AI model "disagrees" with the determinations made by real live doctors.

A spokesperson for NaviHealth, Aaron Albright, stated that the AI-powered tool is not used to make coverage determinations, but rather as a guide to inform providers about the assistance and care that patients may need.

According to Albright, coverage decisions are ultimately based on CMS coverage criteria and the terms of the member's plan. He also stated that the lawsuit has no merit.

However, the families involved in the complaint accuse UnitedHealth of using faulty AI to deny claims as part of a financial scheme. They believe that UnitedHealth collects premiums without having to pay for coverage for elderly beneficiaries who lack the knowledge and resources to appeal the AI-powered decisions.

The complaint alleges that UnitedHealth continues to deny claims using their flawed AI model because they know that only a small percentage of policyholders (roughly 0.2%) will appeal denied claims. As a result, the majority of policyholders either pay out-of-pocket costs or forgo the remainder of their prescribed post-acute care.

AI's utility in health insurance industry

Lawyers for the family are looking to represent "All persons who purchased Medicare Advantage Plan health insurance from Defendants in the United States during the period of four years prior to the filing of the complaint through the present." 

AI's utility in health insurance industry 

Implementing AI algorithms may help health insurance companies automate between 50% and 75% of the manual work involved in approving insurance requests, such as gathering medical information and cross-validating date with patient records, resulting in faster turnaround times that may benefit beneficiaries, consulting firm McKinsey said last year. 

Still, some medical professionals have advised health insurers to rein in their expectations of AI's utility in the health insurance industry. 

In June, the American Medical Association (AMA) praised the use of AI to "speed up the prior authorization process," but called for health insurers to require human examination of patient records before denying their beneficiaries care.

"AI is not a silver bullet," AMA Board Member Marilyn Heine, MD, said in a statement. 

According to a ProPublica review, doctors at health insurer Cigna rejected more than 300,000 claims over the course of two months in a review process that used artificial intelligence.