"Empowering Lessons from Olivia Munn's Battle with Breast Cancer for Women Everywhere"

After a normal mammogram and a negative test for cancer genes, Olivia Munn says it was a breast cancer risk assessment score that helped lead to her diagnosis. Here's what to know about the tool, according to experts.

"Empowering Lessons from Olivia Munn's Battle with Breast Cancer for Women Everywhere"
entertainment
14 Mar 2024, 06:50 PM
twitter icon sharing
facebook icon sharing
instagram icon sharing
youtube icon sharing
telegram icon sharing
icon sharing

Actress Olivia Munn made a shocking revelation on Wednesday, announcing that she had been diagnosed with breast cancer last year. Munn, 43, shared that a risk assessment score, which many women may not be aware of, played a crucial role in detecting her cancer.

Despite having a normal mammogram and testing negative for cancer genes in February 2023, Munn's doctor calculated her breast cancer risk assessment score. The assessment took into account factors such as her age, family history of breast cancer, and the age at which she had her first child.

In a social media post, Munn revealed, "Because of that score, I was sent for an MRI, followed by an ultrasound and a biopsy." The biopsy results showed that she had Luminal B cancer in both breasts, a particularly aggressive and fast-moving form of the disease.

Munn emphasized that if her doctor had not conducted a risk assessment for breast cancer, the cancer would not have been detected until her next scheduled mammogram.

"The decision to conduct the assessment ultimately saved my life," Munn expressed gratefully.

Dr. Elisa Port, chief of breast surgery at Mt. Sinai Health System in New York, who was not involved with Munn's care, says there are a few different risk models available, all of which act as a survey to determine a person's risk level. The Gail Model and Tyrer-Cuzick risk model are two examples.

"You can go online and do this," Port said on "CBS Mornings" Thursday. "It asks you a number of different questions."

The questions include things like:

  • Current age
  • Height and weight
  • Family history
  • At what age a woman started her period
  • If and when the woman has given birth
  • Whether or not the patient had a breast biopsy and what it showed

"If you have a score, for example, that's greater than a 20% lifetime risk of breast cancer, you may be eligible to include MRIs in your screening in addition to potentially mammograms and ultrasounds," Dr. Elizabeth Comen, a breast oncologist at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, told CBS News.

Port says reproductive factors have less of an effect overall than the other factors at pushing your risk higher. A big one to be aware of? Family history.

"(The risk assessment tool) is very helpful to spit out a quantifiable number, but most women should know already if they have a family history of breast cancer, they're at higher risk than the average," she said.

For most women, the average risk of getting breast cancer in their lifetime is about 10% to 12%, Port says. For the general population, mammograms should start at age 40, according to recommended guidelines. For those at higher risk, doctors may suggest starting earlier.

"On the other, far end of the spectrum are women who carry genetic predisposition, and their risk is about 60% to 80%. That's the highest risk," Port said.

But she points out, "we're all at risk," noting that 85% to 90% of women who get breast cancer have no family history.

"Women say, 'I didn't think to do these general screening tests because I didn't think I was at risk.' But even the average woman's risk with no other risk factors is 10% to 12% over her lifetime," Port said. "That's enough to be doing the appropriate screening tests."

The overall takeaway from Munn sharing her story: Know your risk, Port urges.

"Whether that's going online by yourself or going to a doctor who can run this algorithm for you. Those things will all give you a better idea of what you should be doing to be proactive about your health," she said.