"Landmark Decision: Colorado Supreme Court Disqualifies Trump from Presidency over Jan. 6 Riot"

The decision marks the first time a court has found him to be ineligible to return to the White House due to his conduct surrounding the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol.

"Landmark Decision: Colorado Supreme Court Disqualifies Trump from Presidency over Jan. 6 Riot"
entertainment
20 Dec 2023, 02:35 AM
twitter icon sharing
facebook icon sharing
instagram icon sharing
youtube icon sharing
telegram icon sharing
icon sharing
Colorado Supreme Court Disqualifies Former President Trump from Holding Presidency

Washington — The Colorado Supreme Court ruled Tuesday that former President Donald Trump is disqualified from holding the presidency under the Constitution's so-called insurrection clause and ordered the secretary of state to exclude his name from the state's Republican presidential primary ballot.

The landmark decision from the Colorado Supreme Court that Trump cannot hold public office under the Civil War-era provision is unprecedented, and it marks the first time a court has found him to be ineligible to return to the White House due to his conduct surrounding the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol. The ruling does not apply outside of Colorado, and the state high court paused its decision until Jan. 4 — one day before the deadline for Colorado Secretary of State Jena Griswold to certify the candidates for the state's March 5 primary.

Trump Disqualified from Presidential Primary Ballot

A recent court ruling has determined that President Trump is disqualified from holding the office of President under Section Three. The court's majority stated that it would be a wrongful act under the Election Code for the Secretary to list President Trump as a candidate on the presidential primary ballot. As a result, the Secretary is prohibited from listing President Trump's name on the 2024 presidential primary ballot and cannot count any write-in votes cast for him.

Lawsuits challenging Trump's candidacy have been filed in more than 25 states ahead of the 2024 election. However, the Colorado case, brought on behalf of six voters, poses the most immediate threat to his campaign.

Trump is expected to appeal the decision to the U.S. Supreme Court, which could lead to a high-stakes showdown over his eligibility to run. This appeal comes at a critical time as voters in early states are already beginning to cast their ballots in the Republican primaries. The Colorado Supreme Court has paused its decision, stating that if review to the nation's highest court is sought before January 4th, the stay will remain in place, and the secretary will be required to list Trump on the 2024 primary ballot until the U.S. Supreme Court rules.

This case adds to the ongoing legal issues facing Trump and his presidential campaign, including a criminal case related to the 2020 presidential election. The criminal case is set to go to trial in March if allowed to move forward.

Section 3 of the 14th Amendment

The Colorado case centers around Section 3 of the 14th Amendment, which raises the question of whether Trump is barred from holding the nation's highest office. This provision aims to prevent individuals who swore an oath to support the Constitution and engaged in insurrection from holding state or federal office.

The group Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington filed a lawsuit in Colorado state court on behalf of four Republican voters and two unaffiliated voters in September, arguing that Trump's actions related to the Jan. 6 assault disqualified him under Section 3. Dozens of suits filed across the country have raised the same argument, though several have already been dismissed by state courts.

In November, a trial court in Denver found that the events on Jan. 6 satisfy the definition of insurrection, and concluded that Trump engaged in insurrection through incitement. Judge Sarah B. Wallace ultimately determined that the language of Section 3 is unclear as to whether it covered the presidency and the former president, and ordered Griswold to list Trump on the GOP presidential primary ballot.

The Colorado Supreme Court agreed to review the district court's ruling, and held arguments in the case earlier this month. The justices weighed whether the events of Jan. 6 could be considered an "insurrection," and, if so, one that Trump "engaged in." They also considered whether the president is an "officer of the United States" under Section 3.

"If it was so important that the president be included, I come back to the question, why not spell it out?" Justice Carlos Samour asked. Section 3 does not explicitly list the presidency among the federal offices that an insurrectionist cannot hold.

Justice Richard Gabriel, though, asked, "How is it not absurd to say anybody who engaged in insurrection can't serve in office except the president, or former president, or a vice president?"

Recreated News

Enacted in 1868, Section 3 of the 14th Amendment aimed to prevent former Confederate civil and military officeholders from serving in federal or state government. It was primarily utilized in the years following the Civil War. However, in modern times, it has rarely been invoked and has never been used against a former president.

Following the January 6 riot and allegations that Trump incited the attack, along with his decision to run for a second term in the White House, lawsuits were filed in over half of the states in an effort to prevent him from appearing on the ballots.

In Michigan, a judge's ruling in November stated that it is Congress's responsibility to determine whether Trump is disqualified from holding public office. Last week, the state court of appeals upheld the lower court's decision, emphasizing that the secretary of state's role in the presidential primary is primarily administrative. The court concluded that it is ultimately the political parties and candidates who determine who should be included on the primary ballot.

"Even if Trump were disqualified from holding the office of President of the United States by the Insurrection Clause, nothing prevents the Michigan Republican Party from identifying him as a candidate in the upcoming primary election," stated a three-judge appeals court panel. Michigan voters who oppose Trump's candidacy have appealed to the state supreme court.

 A lawsuit in Minnesota seeking to exclude Trump from the ballot for the Republican primary has been dismissed by the state's high court. The court ruled that the primary is an "internal party election to serve internal party purposes" and does not automatically qualify the winner for the general election ballot. However, the court also stated that voters could pursue their case regarding the general election ballot after the state's March 5 primary.