"House Set to Make Historic Decision on Formalizing Biden Impeachment Inquiry"

Republicans have said that formalizing the inquiry would give them leverage in court as they demand documents and witness testimony.

"House Set to Make Historic Decision on Formalizing Biden Impeachment Inquiry"
entertainment
13 Dec 2023, 02:03 PM
twitter icon sharing
facebook icon sharing
instagram icon sharing
youtube icon sharing
telegram icon sharing
icon sharing

House to Vote on Formalizing Impeachment Inquiry into President Biden

Washington — The House is set to vote on formalizing the Republican-led impeachment inquiry into President Biden on Wednesday, a move that could give them more legal firepower to investigate his family's business dealings.

The vote will put Republicans in districts that Mr. Biden won in 2020 on the record about whether they support an investigation that has so far uncovered no wrongdoing by the president. GOP leaders can only afford to lose a handful of members if Wednesday's vote is to succeed.

Republicans on the House Oversight, Judiciary and Ways and Means Committees have been trying to show for months that Mr. Biden was enriched by his family's foreign business dealings and accepted bribes. But the full House never voted to open an impeachment probe, leading many Democrats to question its legal authority.

GOP lawmakers have said that a vote to formally authorize the inquiry would give them leverage in court as they seek documents and witness testimony. The argument has helped sway some Republicans who were on the fence about a formal inquiry.

Recreated News

Republican Rep. Don Bacon of Nebraska, who represents a district that voted for Mr. Biden, said he changed his mind about originally not supporting formalizing the inquiry because the president stopped providing information.

"I said this summer, if the president is providing information, why do we need an inquiry?" Bacon said Tuesday. "But it changed when he stopped doing that."

The fight over impeachment

The resolution to greenlight the investigation lays out rules for public hearings and directs the committees to produce a public report with their findings. Another resolution gives the committee chairmen authority to seek judicial enforcement of their subpoenas with witnesses who refuse to testify. Without formalizing it, a judge could rule that the committees' subpoenas fall outside of a committee's purview.

House Speaker Mike Johnson of Louisiana said last week that it was a necessary step because of "stonewalling" from the White House.

"They're refusing to turn over key witnesses to allow them to testify as they've been subpoenaed," Johnson said. "They're refusing to turn over thousands of documents."

He sought to quell concerns that the vote could be politically risky for some members of his party, saying that the House is only voting to continue the investigation, not on impeaching Mr. Biden.

"Whether someone is for or against impeachment is of no import right now," Johnson said.

News Article

Maryland Rep. Jamie Raskin, the top Democrat on the Oversight Committee, warned Republicans representing districts won by Mr. Biden in 2020 that Wednesday's vote is a "slippery slope" for a vote on impeaching the president.

"It will be a runaway stallion, it will be impossible to stop," Raskin said Monday.

Bacon disagreed that impeachment was inevitable, but said it's "probably more likely than not" that impeachment articles would be drafted.

The White House's response

In a lengthy memo released earlier this month, the White House pushed back on the impeachment effort, pointing to a number of quotes from Republicans and witnesses refuting the allegations of wrongdoing by the president. The White House said Republicans have already acquired thousands of pages of bank records and documents and hours of testimony, which it said rebuts the claim that it is "stonewalling" the investigations.

White House spokesperson Ian Sams called it a "partisan smear campaign" and criticized Republicans for pushing ahead with it "despite the fact that members of their own party have admitted there is no evidence to support" impeachment.

"If they press onwards with this baseless fishing expedition, it only proves how divorced from reality this sham investigation is, and will come at the expense of meaningful work to actually address the issues the American people care about, like lowering costs, creating jobs, and strengthening our health care," Sams said in a statement Monday.

President's Son Indicted on Tax Evasion Charges

The recent vote, conducted just days after the indictment of the president's son, Hunter Biden, on tax evasion charges by special counsel David Weiss, has brought further attention to Hunter Biden's personal finances and business ventures. Congressional committees are currently investigating whether the president personally benefited from his family's businesses and if Biden administration officials attempted to obstruct criminal investigations into the president's son.

Republicans are seeking to interview Hunter Biden and other individuals within the president's orbit in the coming months. The Oversight Committee has warned Hunter Biden that he could face contempt of Congress charges if he fails to comply with a subpoena to appear for a deposition on Wednesday. Hunter Biden's attorney, Abbe Lowell, has stated that he will only testify in an open hearing to prevent the committee from manipulating or distorting the facts.

In September, the Oversight Committee issued subpoenas for the president's brother, James Biden, and Hunter Biden's personal business records.